A personal medical scientist for health problems that still don’t make sense.

1
Share your story and records

Tell WhatDx what’s been happening and upload the reports you have.

2
WhatDx investigates the case

It reconstructs the timeline, studies the evidence, and asks the follow-up questions that matter.

3
Bring back new evidence

When a new lab result, scan, specialist opinion, or treatment response arrives, WhatDx picks up the same investigation again.

WhatDx is not a general chatbot waiting for the right prompt. It uses a physician-designed process and multiple leading AI models to actively investigate your case with you.

No account required 90-day case window Current access: ₹799 Not for emergencies
WhatDx / case 41F2
investigating
Research objective What could explain progressive neuropathy despite a reassuring initial work-up?
Reviewing the case
Aligning neurology notes, laboratory trends, medication changes, and symptom onset into one timeline.
Something does not fit
The neuropathy appears to have started before the medication previously blamed for it.
WhatDx needs one detail
Did the numbness start before or after the gastrointestinal symptoms?
Your answer
The gastrointestinal symptoms started about six months earlier.
Reconsidering the case
That chronology makes a shared systemic explanation more plausible than two unrelated problems.
Next useful evidence
Retrieve the oldest B12, folate, glucose, thyroid, and inflammatory-marker results before adding another broad panel.
WhatDx reviews the case and reconstructs the timeline. It notices that neuropathy began before the medication previously blamed for it. WhatDx asks whether the numbness began before or after the gastrointestinal symptoms. The user answers that the gastrointestinal symptoms began roughly six months earlier. WhatDx updates the working explanation and suggests retrieving earlier laboratory results.
Built for long historiesFocused follow-upEvidence over fluencyPersistent case stateClinician-compatible output
How WhatDx works

It keeps the investigation moving.

General-purpose AI is useful when you already know what to ask. Difficult medical cases often fail at exactly that point. WhatDx is designed to decide what information would actually move the case forward, ask for it, and keep the same question alive over time.

01

Reconstruct the whole case.

Upload notes, scans, lab reports, discharge summaries, and medication histories. WhatDx turns them into one timeline and keeps the source of each claim visible.

02

Let the system do the questioning.

You should not have to invent the next prompt. WhatDx pauses when one missing detail could materially change the investigation.

03

Track what does not fit.

Old assumptions, treatment failures, and contradictory findings stay visible instead of being smoothed away.

04

Reopen when reality changes.

Bring back a specialist opinion, test result, or treatment response and continue the same case instead of starting over.

Our inspirations

Sometimes the answer was already there. Someone just had to connect the dots.

These published cases did not require inventing a new drug or building a research laboratory. They required a careful history, the willingness to reconsider an old assumption, and enough time to follow the clues.

Swipe to explore five examples of diagnostic reasoning.

The diagnosis was static. Her symptoms weren't.

A young woman had been treated as having cerebral palsy for more than ten years. Reopening the diagnosis led to dopa-responsive dystonia; a small dose of levodopa produced a dramatic recovery in the published case.

Old diagnosis reconsideredLongitudinal historyTreatment response

Her mother found the pattern before the system did.

Recurrent swelling can look like many common problems. In a BMJ case report, a mother researched the pattern, raised hereditary angioedema with clinicians, and the hypothesis was confirmed through appropriate testing.

Recurrent attacksCross-organ patternFamily hypothesis

Severe pain. Very little to see.

In a survey of 129 people with EPP, the mean delay from first symptoms to diagnosis was 13 years. Fifteen percent reported that they or their family suggested the diagnosis to a physician.

Reliable triggerSubtle examinationPatient-described phenotype

The clue had been in the lab results for years.

A rheumatology case series of 14 patients found a median 13-year diagnostic delay. Every patient had alkaline phosphatase below the age- and sex-adjusted reference range.

Persistent low ALPBone and joint painDental history

What looked like hives wasn't only a skin problem.

A published case described chronic urticaria unresponsive to conventional therapy alongside fever, bone pain, arthralgia, inflammation, and monoclonal IgM. Recognizing the constellation changed the diagnosis and treatment approach.

Treatment failureMultisystem cluesInflammation

These are published medical cases and case series chosen to illustrate diagnostic reasoning. They do not imply that every unresolved illness has a rare diagnosis, that similar symptoms imply the same condition, or that WhatDx can diagnose or treat disease independently. Medical decisions should be made with qualified healthcare professionals.

These stories are not about patients outsmarting doctors. They show a structural problem: clinicians have limited time across many cases; patients have years of context in one case. We think there should be something in between.

For clinicians

For the cases that do not fit neatly into one visit.

WhatDx can do the slow, structured work before follow-up: gather a longitudinal history, ingest scanned records, ask clarifying questions, and return a concise case dossier for your review.

01

The patient completes the work at home. WhatDx handles the record upload and multi-turn interview without consuming clinic time.

02

You get a structured dossier, not a black-box verdict. Key anomalies, contradictions, treatment failures, and open questions are surfaced for clinical review.

03

The clinician remains the decision-maker. WhatDx is research support, not an autonomous diagnosis or prescribing system.

Learn more No referral fee. No paid recommendation program.
Illustrative clinician reviewing a structured digital case dossier
Technology

Research-grade intelligence for your health.

A difficult medical case deserves more than a quick chatbot answer. WhatDx brings together powerful frontier AI models inside one guided medical research process.

Depending on the case, WhatDx can draw on leading models such as GPT-6 Sol, Claude Fable 5.1 and Gemini 3.8 Flash. You do not need to choose a model, write the perfect prompt, or know what question to ask next.

WhatDx keeps working through the case with you — reviewing records, reconstructing the timeline, asking focused follow-up questions, checking whether the current explanation still fits, and identifying what information may be most useful next.

01
More than one AI looking at the problem

Different frontier models can bring different strengths to the same case. WhatDx can use multiple perspectives when a question is complex or uncertain.

Frontier AI
02
It asks the questions for you

Instead of waiting for you to keep prompting it, WhatDx conducts a structured, in-depth interview and decides which follow-up questions could actually change the investigation.

Guided
03
It keeps the whole case in view

Symptoms, reports, previous diagnoses, treatments and new evidence stay connected over time. You can return when a new test, specialist opinion or treatment response becomes available.

90 days
04
You get something useful to discuss with your doctor

WhatDx turns the investigation into a clear case summary: what fits, what remains uncertain, what deserves another look, and what evidence may help move the case forward.

Reviewable
Research access

One token. One case. Three months to keep investigating.

₹799
₹1,999

current introductory price per 90-day case token

No account, email, phone number, social login, or real name is required to open a research case. Save the random token somewhere safe; it is the key to reopening the case.

Get research access Medical information and files you choose to submit are sensitive session data. Review the Privacy Policy before using the service.
01
Get a research token.

Purchase access or use a configured discount code. Keep the token somewhere you control.

02
Run the first interview.

Upload records and answer focused questions about the case.

03
Bring back real-world evidence.

WhatDx may ask for a specialist opinion, test result, old report, or treatment-response update.

04
Reopen the same investigation.

New information updates the case rather than forcing you to start from zero.

A research partner, not a replacement for care

More time and intelligence devoted to helping you and your clinicians understand the case.

WhatDx does not provide emergency care, perform physical examinations, independently diagnose disease, or tell patients to start, stop, or change treatment without an appropriate clinician.